Review Workspace

RhetoricScore Review Lab

Review already-generated annotations and mappings for future Gold Data. Start from the source text and its context, compare the original label with the RhetoricScore mapping, then decide whether the item should be accepted, rejected, remapped, or kept uncertain.

Reviewer question

Is this annotation or mapping usable for Gold Data?

Dataset Queue

Choose Review Set

94 / 1063
cocolofa / test cocolofa / train cocolofa / validation cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_alpha cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_v0_sample semeval2020_task11 / test semeval2020_task11 / train semeval2020_task11 / validation
Step 1 · Source

semeval2020_task11 / validation

94 / 1063
Context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Gina Haspel, New CIA Director

President Donald Trump nominated Gina Haspel as the new director of the CIA, announcing the news on Twitter.
Mike Pompeo, the previous director, was nominated to run the State Department to replace the ousted Rex Tillerson.
* * * * *
IN MAY 2013, the Washington Post’s Greg Miller reported that the head of the CIA’s clandestine service was being shifted out of that position as a result of “a management shake-up” by then-Director John Brennan.
As Miller documented, this official — whom the paper did not name because she was a covert agent at the time — was centrally involved in the worst abuses of the CIA’s Bush-era torture regime.
As Miller put it, she was “directly involved in its controversial interrogation program” and had an “extensive role” in torturing detainees.
Even more troubling, she “had run a secret prison in Thailand” — part of the CIA’s network of “black sites” — “where two detainees were subjected to waterboarding and other harsh techniques.” The Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on torture also detailed the central role she played in the particularly gruesome torture of detainee Abu Zubaydah.
Beyond all that, she played a vital rol

[excerpt truncated]
Step 2 · Annotation

Compare Original Label and RhetoricScore Mapping

Review Target
Original Dataset Labels
None provided
RhetoricScore Mapped Labels
None provided
Detected / Imported Techniques
None detected
Annotation Quality
external_unlabeled
Mapping Confidence
unknown
Decision focus

Review the mapping and annotation quality. You do not need to judge whether the source text is factually true.

Previous sample Next sample
Internal Reference

Review Item Details

Diagnostics
Review Item ID
semeval2020_task11_validation_93
Source Type
semeval2020_task11
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Source Context

Article Metadata

Article ID
article738542398
Full context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Gina Haspel, New CIA Director

President Donald Trump nominated Gina Haspel as the new director of the CIA, announcing the news on Twitter.
Mike Pompeo, the previous director, was nominated to run the State Department to replace the ousted Rex Tillerson.
* * * * *
IN MAY 2013, the Washington Post’s Greg Miller reported that the head of the CIA’s clandestine service was being shifted out of that position as a result of “a management shake-up” by then-Director John Brennan.
As Miller documented, this official — whom the paper did not name because she was a covert agent at the time — was centrally involved in the worst abuses of the CIA’s Bush-era torture regime.
As Miller put it, she was “directly involved in its controversial interrogation program” and had an “extensive role” in torturing detainees.
Even more troubling, she “had run a secret prison in Thailand” — part of the CIA’s network of “black sites” — “where two detainees were subjected to waterboarding and other harsh techniques.” The Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on torture also detailed the central role she played in the particularly gruesome torture of detainee Abu Zubaydah.
Beyond all that, she played a vital rol

[excerpt truncated]
Summary
Review the precomputed dataset sample without changing scoring.
Reading Level: review only

Context Summary: Loaded from the existing review dataset.

Scores

Rhetorical Scores

High Variance Low Variance Reference Zone

Score data describing the text's rhetorical signals compared with the selected reference context.

Scores not available for this input.
Rhetorical Stability
N/A

No precomputed stability score is available for this review sample.

Detected Patterns

Detected Rhetorical Patterns

No unusual rhetorical patterns were detected in this sample.
Experimental Layer

Cognitive Quality Signals (Experimental)

Signal Status
Not_available
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Explainability Details

Explainability Details (η Coefficients & Context Modifiers)

Detected Technique Domain Core Frequency Saturated Score Final Weight Alpha Context Eta Applied
No detailed explainability table is available for this result.
Raw metadata / debug 
{
  "article_id": "article738542398",
  "article_text_length": 1963,
  "raw_split": "dev",
  "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
  "template_label": "?"
}
Inspect Backend Response (Diagnostic RAW JSON) 
{
  "id": "semeval2020_task11_validation_93",
  "source_dataset": "semeval2020_task11",
  "split": "validation",
  "language": "en",
  "text": "the worst abuses of the CIA’s Bush-era torture regime",
  "context": null,
  "labels_original": [],
  "labels_rhetoric": [],
  "techniques": [],
  "span_start": 614,
  "span_end": 667,
  "is_manipulative": true,
  "annotation_quality": "external_unlabeled",
  "mapping_confidence": "unknown",
  "metadata": {
    "article_id": "article738542398",
    "article_text_length": 1963,
    "raw_split": "dev",
    "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
    "template_label": "?"
  }
}