Review Workspace

RhetoricScore Review Lab

Review already-generated annotations and mappings for future Gold Data. Start from the source text and its context, compare the original label with the RhetoricScore mapping, then decide whether the item should be accepted, rejected, remapped, or kept uncertain.

Reviewer question

Is this annotation or mapping usable for Gold Data?

Dataset Queue

Choose Review Set

835 / 1063
cocolofa / test cocolofa / train cocolofa / validation cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_alpha cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_v0_sample semeval2020_task11 / test semeval2020_task11 / train semeval2020_task11 / validation
Step 1 · Source

semeval2020_task11 / validation

835 / 1063
Context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Mueller Submits His Russia Report to Justice Department

Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his 22-month Russia investigation and submitted a report to Attorney General William Barr on Friday, triggering a clamor from Congress to see the findings.
A Justice Department official told the Associated Press that Mueller is not recommending any further indictments.
In a letter to the heads of the Senate and House judiciary committees, Barr described Mueller’s submission as a “confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions he has reached.”
“I am reviewing the report and anticipate that I may be in a position to advise you of the Special Counsel’s principal conclusions as soon as this weekend,” the letter said.
Barr did not detail what the report contains, but did say that the Justice Department did not overrule any decision Mueller made.
Barr said he will consult with Mueller and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who has mostly overseen the Special Counsel’s Office, about “what other information from the report” can be released to Congress and the public.
The White House and President Trump’s lawyers said the next decisions are up to Barr.
There is a p

[excerpt truncated]
Step 2 · Annotation

Compare Original Label and RhetoricScore Mapping

Review Target
Original Dataset Labels
None provided
RhetoricScore Mapped Labels
None provided
Detected / Imported Techniques
None detected
Annotation Quality
external_unlabeled
Mapping Confidence
unknown
Decision focus

Review the mapping and annotation quality. You do not need to judge whether the source text is factually true.

Previous sample Next sample
Internal Reference

Review Item Details

Diagnostics
Review Item ID
semeval2020_task11_validation_834
Source Type
semeval2020_task11
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Source Context

Article Metadata

Article ID
article832908730
Full context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Mueller Submits His Russia Report to Justice Department

Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his 22-month Russia investigation and submitted a report to Attorney General William Barr on Friday, triggering a clamor from Congress to see the findings.
A Justice Department official told the Associated Press that Mueller is not recommending any further indictments.
In a letter to the heads of the Senate and House judiciary committees, Barr described Mueller’s submission as a “confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions he has reached.”
“I am reviewing the report and anticipate that I may be in a position to advise you of the Special Counsel’s principal conclusions as soon as this weekend,” the letter said.
Barr did not detail what the report contains, but did say that the Justice Department did not overrule any decision Mueller made.
Barr said he will consult with Mueller and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who has mostly overseen the Special Counsel’s Office, about “what other information from the report” can be released to Congress and the public.
The White House and President Trump’s lawyers said the next decisions are up to Barr.
There is a p

[excerpt truncated]
Summary
Review the precomputed dataset sample without changing scoring.
Reading Level: review only

Context Summary: Loaded from the existing review dataset.

Scores

Rhetorical Scores

High Variance Low Variance Reference Zone

Score data describing the text's rhetorical signals compared with the selected reference context.

Scores not available for this input.
Rhetorical Stability
N/A

No precomputed stability score is available for this review sample.

Detected Patterns

Detected Rhetorical Patterns

No unusual rhetorical patterns were detected in this sample.
Experimental Layer

Cognitive Quality Signals (Experimental)

Signal Status
Not_available
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Explainability Details

Explainability Details (η Coefficients & Context Modifiers)

Detected Technique Domain Core Frequency Saturated Score Final Weight Alpha Context Eta Applied
No detailed explainability table is available for this result.
Raw metadata / debug 
{
  "article_id": "article832908730",
  "article_text_length": 5763,
  "raw_split": "dev",
  "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
  "template_label": "?"
}
Inspect Backend Response (Diagnostic RAW JSON) 
{
  "id": "semeval2020_task11_validation_834",
  "source_dataset": "semeval2020_task11",
  "split": "validation",
  "language": "en",
  "text": "Now",
  "context": null,
  "labels_original": [],
  "labels_rhetoric": [],
  "techniques": [],
  "span_start": 1952,
  "span_end": 1955,
  "is_manipulative": true,
  "annotation_quality": "external_unlabeled",
  "mapping_confidence": "unknown",
  "metadata": {
    "article_id": "article832908730",
    "article_text_length": 5763,
    "raw_split": "dev",
    "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
    "template_label": "?"
  }
}