Review Workspace

RhetoricScore Review Lab

Review already-generated annotations and mappings for future Gold Data. Start from the source text and its context, compare the original label with the RhetoricScore mapping, then decide whether the item should be accepted, rejected, remapped, or kept uncertain.

Reviewer question

Is this annotation or mapping usable for Gold Data?

Dataset Queue

Choose Review Set

518 / 1063
cocolofa / test cocolofa / train cocolofa / validation cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_alpha cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_v0_sample semeval2020_task11 / test semeval2020_task11 / train semeval2020_task11 / validation
Step 1 · Source

semeval2020_task11 / validation

518 / 1063
Context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Horrifying Details Released: 2 Jihadi Muslims At Deadly NM Islamic Compound Hit With New Charges

Siraj Ibn Wahhaj and one of his devout wives were charged with abuse of a child resulting in the death of a child and conspiracy to commit abuse of a child.
Law enforcement rushed to destroy the Islamic compound just days after the kidnapping and murder made national news.
They destroyed evidence, despite the fact that the investigation was new and ongoing.
New charges were filed against the devout (“extremist)” Muslims.
For years, the FBI and local law enforcement did nothing about this jihad compound, despite tips and numerous calls from concerned citizens.
It took the murder of a child to get them to pay attention.
What is the first thing they do after it is discovered a child was murdered on the compound and several starved to almost certain death?
They destroyed the compound to cover up both their negligence and what happened there.
News of what happened there was embarrassing to the Muslim community in the U.S., and making Islam look good seems to be the top priority of law enforcement officials.
It’s sharia compliance in New Mexico.
take our poll - story continues below
Will Bre

[excerpt truncated]
Step 2 · Annotation

Compare Original Label and RhetoricScore Mapping

Review Target
Original Dataset Labels
None provided
RhetoricScore Mapped Labels
None provided
Detected / Imported Techniques
None detected
Annotation Quality
external_unlabeled
Mapping Confidence
unknown
Decision focus

Review the mapping and annotation quality. You do not need to judge whether the source text is factually true.

Previous sample Next sample
Internal Reference

Review Item Details

Diagnostics
Review Item ID
semeval2020_task11_validation_517
Source Type
semeval2020_task11
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Source Context

Article Metadata

Article ID
article782149032
Full context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Horrifying Details Released: 2 Jihadi Muslims At Deadly NM Islamic Compound Hit With New Charges

Siraj Ibn Wahhaj and one of his devout wives were charged with abuse of a child resulting in the death of a child and conspiracy to commit abuse of a child.
Law enforcement rushed to destroy the Islamic compound just days after the kidnapping and murder made national news.
They destroyed evidence, despite the fact that the investigation was new and ongoing.
New charges were filed against the devout (“extremist)” Muslims.
For years, the FBI and local law enforcement did nothing about this jihad compound, despite tips and numerous calls from concerned citizens.
It took the murder of a child to get them to pay attention.
What is the first thing they do after it is discovered a child was murdered on the compound and several starved to almost certain death?
They destroyed the compound to cover up both their negligence and what happened there.
News of what happened there was embarrassing to the Muslim community in the U.S., and making Islam look good seems to be the top priority of law enforcement officials.
It’s sharia compliance in New Mexico.
take our poll - story continues below
Will Bre

[excerpt truncated]
Summary
Review the precomputed dataset sample without changing scoring.
Reading Level: review only

Context Summary: Loaded from the existing review dataset.

Scores

Rhetorical Scores

High Variance Low Variance Reference Zone

Score data describing the text's rhetorical signals compared with the selected reference context.

Scores not available for this input.
Rhetorical Stability
N/A

No precomputed stability score is available for this review sample.

Detected Patterns

Detected Rhetorical Patterns

No unusual rhetorical patterns were detected in this sample.
Experimental Layer

Cognitive Quality Signals (Experimental)

Signal Status
Not_available
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Explainability Details

Explainability Details (η Coefficients & Context Modifiers)

Detected Technique Domain Core Frequency Saturated Score Final Weight Alpha Context Eta Applied
No detailed explainability table is available for this result.
Raw metadata / debug 
{
  "article_id": "article782149032",
  "article_text_length": 1724,
  "raw_split": "dev",
  "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
  "template_label": "?"
}
Inspect Backend Response (Diagnostic RAW JSON) 
{
  "id": "semeval2020_task11_validation_517",
  "source_dataset": "semeval2020_task11",
  "split": "validation",
  "language": "en",
  "text": "Hit With New Charges",
  "context": null,
  "labels_original": [],
  "labels_rhetoric": [],
  "techniques": [],
  "span_start": 76,
  "span_end": 96,
  "is_manipulative": true,
  "annotation_quality": "external_unlabeled",
  "mapping_confidence": "unknown",
  "metadata": {
    "article_id": "article782149032",
    "article_text_length": 1724,
    "raw_split": "dev",
    "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
    "template_label": "?"
  }
}