Review Workspace

RhetoricScore Review Lab

Review already-generated annotations and mappings for future Gold Data. Start from the source text and its context, compare the original label with the RhetoricScore mapping, then decide whether the item should be accepted, rejected, remapped, or kept uncertain.

Reviewer question

Is this annotation or mapping usable for Gold Data?

Dataset Queue

Choose Review Set

372 / 1063
cocolofa / test cocolofa / train cocolofa / validation cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_alpha cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_v0_sample semeval2020_task11 / test semeval2020_task11 / train semeval2020_task11 / validation
Step 1 · Source

semeval2020_task11 / validation

372 / 1063
Context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Couple question why police waited so long to search New Mexico compound

(CNN) A New Mexico couple told authorities months ago they thought a missing Georgia boy and his fugitive father were living in a filthy compound on their property.
But police did not carry out a search of the property until last week, Taos County Sheriff Jerry Hogrefe said, because they did not believe they had probable cause in the case.
That delay is facing scrutiny in the wake of Monday's discovery of a young boy's remains at the compound.
"They were dragging their feet.
They were taking too long," said Tanya Badger, who with her husband, Jason, told authorities about the boy's suspected presence at the compound.
"Even if they were trying to build a case or whatnot, a child's life is at stake."
It's not clear whether the remains are those of Abdul-Ghani Wahhaj, a child with severe medical problems who disappeared from Georgia about nine months ago.
The remains were discovered in a wretched compound along with 11 starving children, authorities said.
More details about the horrid compound could be revealed Wednesday when the five adults arrested from the site make their first court appearances.
Authorities r

[excerpt truncated]
Step 2 · Annotation

Compare Original Label and RhetoricScore Mapping

Review Target
Original Dataset Labels
None provided
RhetoricScore Mapped Labels
None provided
Detected / Imported Techniques
None detected
Annotation Quality
external_unlabeled
Mapping Confidence
unknown
Decision focus

Review the mapping and annotation quality. You do not need to judge whether the source text is factually true.

Previous sample Next sample
Internal Reference

Review Item Details

Diagnostics
Review Item ID
semeval2020_task11_validation_371
Source Type
semeval2020_task11
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Source Context

Article Metadata

Article ID
article777869943
Full context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Couple question why police waited so long to search New Mexico compound

(CNN) A New Mexico couple told authorities months ago they thought a missing Georgia boy and his fugitive father were living in a filthy compound on their property.
But police did not carry out a search of the property until last week, Taos County Sheriff Jerry Hogrefe said, because they did not believe they had probable cause in the case.
That delay is facing scrutiny in the wake of Monday's discovery of a young boy's remains at the compound.
"They were dragging their feet.
They were taking too long," said Tanya Badger, who with her husband, Jason, told authorities about the boy's suspected presence at the compound.
"Even if they were trying to build a case or whatnot, a child's life is at stake."
It's not clear whether the remains are those of Abdul-Ghani Wahhaj, a child with severe medical problems who disappeared from Georgia about nine months ago.
The remains were discovered in a wretched compound along with 11 starving children, authorities said.
More details about the horrid compound could be revealed Wednesday when the five adults arrested from the site make their first court appearances.
Authorities r

[excerpt truncated]
Summary
Review the precomputed dataset sample without changing scoring.
Reading Level: review only

Context Summary: Loaded from the existing review dataset.

Scores

Rhetorical Scores

High Variance Low Variance Reference Zone

Score data describing the text's rhetorical signals compared with the selected reference context.

Scores not available for this input.
Rhetorical Stability
N/A

No precomputed stability score is available for this review sample.

Detected Patterns

Detected Rhetorical Patterns

No unusual rhetorical patterns were detected in this sample.
Experimental Layer

Cognitive Quality Signals (Experimental)

Signal Status
Not_available
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Explainability Details

Explainability Details (η Coefficients & Context Modifiers)

Detected Technique Domain Core Frequency Saturated Score Final Weight Alpha Context Eta Applied
No detailed explainability table is available for this result.
Raw metadata / debug 
{
  "article_id": "article777869943",
  "article_text_length": 6493,
  "raw_split": "dev",
  "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
  "template_label": "?"
}
Inspect Backend Response (Diagnostic RAW JSON) 
{
  "id": "semeval2020_task11_validation_371",
  "source_dataset": "semeval2020_task11",
  "split": "validation",
  "language": "en",
  "text": "beyond frustrated",
  "context": null,
  "labels_original": [],
  "labels_rhetoric": [],
  "techniques": [],
  "span_start": 1748,
  "span_end": 1765,
  "is_manipulative": true,
  "annotation_quality": "external_unlabeled",
  "mapping_confidence": "unknown",
  "metadata": {
    "article_id": "article777869943",
    "article_text_length": 6493,
    "raw_split": "dev",
    "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
    "template_label": "?"
  }
}