Review Workspace

RhetoricScore Review Lab

Review already-generated annotations and mappings for future Gold Data. Start from the source text and its context, compare the original label with the RhetoricScore mapping, then decide whether the item should be accepted, rejected, remapped, or kept uncertain.

Reviewer question

Is this annotation or mapping usable for Gold Data?

Dataset Queue

Choose Review Set

354 / 1063
cocolofa / test cocolofa / train cocolofa / validation cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_alpha cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_v0_sample semeval2020_task11 / test semeval2020_task11 / train semeval2020_task11 / validation
Step 1 · Source

semeval2020_task11 / validation

354 / 1063
Context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Texan behind 3D-printed guns vows legal fight as White House endorses court ruling | Bangkok Post: news

CHICAGO - A US gun rights advocate began gearing up for a legal fight Wednesday to be able to publish online blueprints for 3D-printed firearms, as the White House signaled support for a federal judge's decision to block the venture.
Eight US states and the District of Columbia have argued in court that the blueprints available online to make untraceable, undetectable plastic weapons like this single-shot "Liberator" handgun could fall into the wrong hands
Cody Wilson's Texas-based company Defense Distributed had briefly made the blueprints available online, but Seattle-based US District Judge Robert Lasnik granted an injunction Tuesday to take the material down.
The Donald Trump administration last month gave permission for Wilson to publish the blueprints, but the White House said Wednesday the president was unaware of the decision and was glad it was being reviewed.
Eight US states and the District of Columbia sued, arguing the blueprints could allow anyone -- from a teen to a 'lone wolf' gunman -- to make untraceable, undetectable plastic weapons.
Wilson complied with the ju

[excerpt truncated]
Step 2 · Annotation

Compare Original Label and RhetoricScore Mapping

Review Target
Original Dataset Labels
None provided
RhetoricScore Mapped Labels
None provided
Detected / Imported Techniques
None detected
Annotation Quality
external_unlabeled
Mapping Confidence
unknown
Decision focus

Review the mapping and annotation quality. You do not need to judge whether the source text is factually true.

Previous sample Next sample
Internal Reference

Review Item Details

Diagnostics
Review Item ID
semeval2020_task11_validation_353
Source Type
semeval2020_task11
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Source Context

Article Metadata

Article ID
article776385494
Full context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Texan behind 3D-printed guns vows legal fight as White House endorses court ruling | Bangkok Post: news

CHICAGO - A US gun rights advocate began gearing up for a legal fight Wednesday to be able to publish online blueprints for 3D-printed firearms, as the White House signaled support for a federal judge's decision to block the venture.
Eight US states and the District of Columbia have argued in court that the blueprints available online to make untraceable, undetectable plastic weapons like this single-shot "Liberator" handgun could fall into the wrong hands
Cody Wilson's Texas-based company Defense Distributed had briefly made the blueprints available online, but Seattle-based US District Judge Robert Lasnik granted an injunction Tuesday to take the material down.
The Donald Trump administration last month gave permission for Wilson to publish the blueprints, but the White House said Wednesday the president was unaware of the decision and was glad it was being reviewed.
Eight US states and the District of Columbia sued, arguing the blueprints could allow anyone -- from a teen to a 'lone wolf' gunman -- to make untraceable, undetectable plastic weapons.
Wilson complied with the ju

[excerpt truncated]
Summary
Review the precomputed dataset sample without changing scoring.
Reading Level: review only

Context Summary: Loaded from the existing review dataset.

Scores

Rhetorical Scores

High Variance Low Variance Reference Zone

Score data describing the text's rhetorical signals compared with the selected reference context.

Scores not available for this input.
Rhetorical Stability
N/A

No precomputed stability score is available for this review sample.

Detected Patterns

Detected Rhetorical Patterns

No unusual rhetorical patterns were detected in this sample.
Experimental Layer

Cognitive Quality Signals (Experimental)

Signal Status
Not_available
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Explainability Details

Explainability Details (η Coefficients & Context Modifiers)

Detected Technique Domain Core Frequency Saturated Score Final Weight Alpha Context Eta Applied
No detailed explainability table is available for this result.
Raw metadata / debug 
{
  "article_id": "article776385494",
  "article_text_length": 4489,
  "raw_split": "dev",
  "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
  "template_label": "?"
}
Inspect Backend Response (Diagnostic RAW JSON) 
{
  "id": "semeval2020_task11_validation_353",
  "source_dataset": "semeval2020_task11",
  "split": "validation",
  "language": "en",
  "text": "dangerous and reckless",
  "context": null,
  "labels_original": [],
  "labels_rhetoric": [],
  "techniques": [],
  "span_start": 3902,
  "span_end": 3924,
  "is_manipulative": true,
  "annotation_quality": "external_unlabeled",
  "mapping_confidence": "unknown",
  "metadata": {
    "article_id": "article776385494",
    "article_text_length": 4489,
    "raw_split": "dev",
    "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
    "template_label": "?"
  }
}