Review Workspace

RhetoricScore Review Lab

Review already-generated annotations and mappings for future Gold Data. Start from the source text and its context, compare the original label with the RhetoricScore mapping, then decide whether the item should be accepted, rejected, remapped, or kept uncertain.

Reviewer question

Is this annotation or mapping usable for Gold Data?

Dataset Queue

Choose Review Set

156 / 1063
cocolofa / test cocolofa / train cocolofa / validation cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_alpha cognitive / cognitive_benchmark_v0_sample semeval2020_task11 / test semeval2020_task11 / train semeval2020_task11 / validation
Step 1 · Source

semeval2020_task11 / validation

156 / 1063
Context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Who Is Behind the Internet Thought Police?

An article, “What the Red Pill Means for Radicals,” published on June 7 in the ironically named publication Fair Observer might have passed unnoticed as yet another uninformed, biased and ideologically motivated attack on all who ever get labeled “extremists.” The piece is so riddled with non-sequiturs and wild generalizations that it seems almost cruel to rip it to shreds.
But the author is Bharath Ganesh.
A little online research reveals that Ganesh is currently working at the Oxford Internet Institute — at the esteemed Oxford University — on a research project funded by the European Union to devise ways to disrupt the “far right” online.
The project in question is under the banner of the Vox-Pol Network of Excellence, which “is designed to comprehensively research, analyse, debate, and critique issues surrounding violent online political extremism (VOPE).”
This research group is only interested in violent extremism – according to their website.
“The qualifier ‘violent’ is therefore employed here to describe VOX-Pol’s interest, which is in those that employ or advocate physical violence against other individuals and groups to forward th

[excerpt truncated]
Step 2 · Annotation

Compare Original Label and RhetoricScore Mapping

Review Target
Original Dataset Labels
None provided
RhetoricScore Mapped Labels
None provided
Detected / Imported Techniques
None detected
Annotation Quality
external_unlabeled
Mapping Confidence
unknown
Decision focus

Review the mapping and annotation quality. You do not need to judge whether the source text is factually true.

Previous sample Next sample
Internal Reference

Review Item Details

Diagnostics
Review Item ID
semeval2020_task11_validation_155
Source Type
semeval2020_task11
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Source Context

Article Metadata

Article ID
article763114850
Full context excerpt

Source: local SemEval corpus fallback

Who Is Behind the Internet Thought Police?

An article, “What the Red Pill Means for Radicals,” published on June 7 in the ironically named publication Fair Observer might have passed unnoticed as yet another uninformed, biased and ideologically motivated attack on all who ever get labeled “extremists.” The piece is so riddled with non-sequiturs and wild generalizations that it seems almost cruel to rip it to shreds.
But the author is Bharath Ganesh.
A little online research reveals that Ganesh is currently working at the Oxford Internet Institute — at the esteemed Oxford University — on a research project funded by the European Union to devise ways to disrupt the “far right” online.
The project in question is under the banner of the Vox-Pol Network of Excellence, which “is designed to comprehensively research, analyse, debate, and critique issues surrounding violent online political extremism (VOPE).”
This research group is only interested in violent extremism – according to their website.
“The qualifier ‘violent’ is therefore employed here to describe VOX-Pol’s interest, which is in those that employ or advocate physical violence against other individuals and groups to forward th

[excerpt truncated]
Summary
Review the precomputed dataset sample without changing scoring.
Reading Level: review only

Context Summary: Loaded from the existing review dataset.

Scores

Rhetorical Scores

High Variance Low Variance Reference Zone

Score data describing the text's rhetorical signals compared with the selected reference context.

Scores not available for this input.
Rhetorical Stability
N/A

No precomputed stability score is available for this review sample.

Detected Patterns

Detected Rhetorical Patterns

No unusual rhetorical patterns were detected in this sample.
Experimental Layer

Cognitive Quality Signals (Experimental)

Signal Status
Not_available
Language
en
Reference Context
Default
Explainability Details

Explainability Details (η Coefficients & Context Modifiers)

Detected Technique Domain Core Frequency Saturated Score Final Weight Alpha Context Eta Applied
No detailed explainability table is available for this result.
Raw metadata / debug 
{
  "article_id": "article763114850",
  "article_text_length": 6965,
  "raw_split": "dev",
  "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
  "template_label": "?"
}
Inspect Backend Response (Diagnostic RAW JSON) 
{
  "id": "semeval2020_task11_validation_155",
  "source_dataset": "semeval2020_task11",
  "split": "validation",
  "language": "en",
  "text": "yet another uninformed, biased and ideologically motivated attack",
  "context": null,
  "labels_original": [],
  "labels_rhetoric": [],
  "techniques": [],
  "span_start": 197,
  "span_end": 262,
  "is_manipulative": true,
  "annotation_quality": "external_unlabeled",
  "mapping_confidence": "unknown",
  "metadata": {
    "article_id": "article763114850",
    "article_text_length": 6965,
    "raw_split": "dev",
    "source_loader": "zenodo_fallback",
    "template_label": "?"
  }
}